The O–O bond-formation mechanism in water oxidation is still ambiguous even now. In this issue of Chem, Wang and co-workers prove that this mechanism on a Co-based electrocatalyst can switch from a radical coupling pathway to a water nucleophilic attack pathway when the applied potential is lifted. The O–O bond-formation mechanism in water oxidation is still ambiguous even now. In this issue of Chem, Wang and co-workers prove that this mechanism on a Co-based electrocatalyst can switch from a radical coupling pathway to a water nucleophilic attack pathway when the applied potential is lifted. The oxygen evolution reaction (OER) is of paramount significance in the area of solar energy conversion. It is the initial step of photosynthesis to produce dioxygen for supporting aerobic life and to liberate electrons and protons as solar energy carriers. Meanwhile, in the area of next-generation energy revolution based on electrochemistry, it is the key anode reaction of a series of energy-related small-molecule activations (hydrogen production, carbon dioxide reduction, nitrogen reduction, and so forth) driven by sustainable electricity.1Zhang X.-P. Wang H.-Y. Zheng H. Zhang W. Cao R. O–O bond formation mechanisms during the oxygen evolution reaction over synthetic molecular catalysts.Chin. J. Catal. 2021; 42: 1253-1268Crossref Scopus (44) Google Scholar The OER mechanism is very complicated because of its multiple and diverse proton-coupled electron-transfer fundamental steps, including the kinetically challenging O–O bond-formation step. With decades of research, the O–O bond-formation mechanism on the oxygen-evolving center (OEC) in nature is still under debate. This important and challenging process has inspired chemists to develop a wealth of catalytic motifs in order to understand its reaction mechanism. However, catalytic O–O bond formation is still not fully understood on homogeneous molecular catalysts with well-defined structures—not to mention on heterogeneous systems with more uncertainties of the structures of surface catalytic centers.2Zhang X.-P. Chandra A. Lee Y.-M. Cao R. Ray K. Nam W. Transition metal-mediated O-O bond formation and activation in chemistry and biology.Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021; 50: 4804-4811Crossref PubMed Google Scholar In this issue of Chem, Wang and co-workers probe the O–O bond-formation mechanism on heterogeneous Co-based electrocatalysts by innovatively changing the water activity in water-in-salt electrolytes.3Lang C. Li J. Yang K.R. Wang Y. He D. Thorne J.E. Croslow S. Dong Q. Zhao Y. Prostko G. et al.Observation of a potential-dependent switch of water oxidation mechanism on Co-oxide-based catalysts.Chem. 2021; 7: 2101-2117https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chempr.2021.03.015Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Scopus (16) Google Scholar They discovered that the water-oxidation mechanism might switch from an intramolecular oxygen radical coupling (RC) mechanism at low potentials to a predominant water nucleophilic-attack acid-base (AB) mechanism at higher potentials. Specifically, the resting state of the catalyst under water-oxidation potential is the HO–Co(III)–(μ-O)2–Co(IV)–OH intermediate. The hydroxide has a partial radical character to undergo coupling to form hydroperoxide via the RC mechanism at relatively low potentials. At higher potentials, the above-mentioned intermediate can be further oxidized into the O=Co(IV)–(μ-O)2–Co(IV)–OH motif. The terminal electrophilic oxo of O=Co(IV)– can participate in the water nucleophilic-attack reaction to form the O–O bond through an AB mechanism. In addition, the authors believe that the activation energy barrier of the AB mechanism is a function of applied electrode potential given that one of the substances (water) has a large dipole moment, and its dynamics at electrified interfaces could strongly depend on the electrode potential. The RC pathway is thermodynamically favored over the AB pathway under low potentials, whereas the formation of O=Co(IV)– and the polarization of water at higher potentials cause predominance of the AB pathway. To elucidate the switch of the O–O bond-formation mechanism at different potentials, the authors cleverly controlled the water activity by using water-in-salt electrolytes. They adjusted the water activity from 1 to 0.83 by changing the NaNO3 concentrations in a 0.1 M KPi buffer at neutral pH. They observed a decrease in the water-oxidation rate as the water activity decreased in a potential range of 1.61–1.71 V (versus reversible hydrogen electrode [RHE]; all potentials refer to RHE hereafter). The water-oxidation rate decreased by a factor of ∼1.2 at 1.615 V when the water activity decreased from 1 to 0.83. Interestingly, this rate-suppression factor dramatically increased to ∼4.3 at 1.71 V. The distinctive suppression factors indicate that water molecules are less likely to be involved in the rate-determining step (RDS) of water oxidation at low potentials, whereas water participates in the RDS as a substance at high potentials. This observation corroborates the switch of O–O bond formation from the intramolecular oxygen RC pathway to the water nucleophilic-attack AB pathway. The authors also tested the kinetic isotope effect (KIE) on water oxidation in heavy water with KIE values of ∼2 and ∼4.2 at 1.625 and 1.71 V, respectively. The O–O bond formation from the RC pathway was insensitive to the H/D substitution, but the AB pathway was highly likely to involve the transfer of protons in the RDS. This KIE experiment consolidates their conclusion that the OER mechanism switches at different potentials. In addition, the authors reported the surface-enhanced infrared absorption spectroscopy (SEIRAS) of the catalysts on Au substrate with isotopic labeling experiments to insinuate the presence of Co superoxide intermediate under water-oxidation potentials, which supported their proposed catalytic cycles to a certain extent. In addition to evaluating how altering the activity of water affects O–O bond formation, the authors also performed comprehensive and well-designed control experiments to tightly bridge their findings and conclusions. They excluded any irreversible changes, the effects of limited mass transport, the effects of Na+ from the salts, and the effects of transition-metal impurities on catalytic activity in the tested system; they confirmed that the high concentration of salts did not significantly affect the local pH or block the catalytic sites at the interface; and they also showed a near-unity faradic efficiency of water oxidation to dioxygen. The exact experimental design and the rigorous analysis of experimental data in heterogeneous electrocatalytic water oxidation are extremely important because this is a complicated reaction happening at an intricate interface. Unlike in homogeneous systems, where the catalyst structures are relatively well defined, the surface structures of heterogeneous electrocatalysts are very ambiguous.4Yang X. Wang Y. Li C.M. Wang D. Mechanisms of water oxidation on heterogeneous catalyst surfaces.Nano Res. 2021; https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-021-3607-5Crossref Scopus (21) Google Scholar The reaction rates of heterogeneous electrocatalysis could be affected by a variety of factors, and the interferences should be eliminated when the origins of the activities are assigned.5Trotochaud L. Young S.L. Ranney J.K. Boettcher S.W. Nickel-iron oxyhydroxide oxygen-evolution electrocatalysts: the role of intentional and incidental iron incorporation.J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014; 136: 6744-6753Crossref PubMed Scopus (2130) Google Scholar The following aspects are recommended in heterogeneous electrocatalysis regarding mechanism studies. First, it is better to find a catalyst with a specific surface structure, and this structure should be relatively stable under catalytic conditions. Second, to exclude any possible interference, catalyst platforms for comparison studies with limited but straightforward differences are favored over counterparts with many physical varieties. Third, rigorous experimental behaviors should be followed and special attention should be paid to experimental details so as to include any possible minor factors that could be easily ignored but might have considerable impact on catalytic performance.6Wei C. Rao R.R. Peng J.Y. Huang B.T. Stephens I.E.L. Risch M. Xu Z.C.J. Shao-Horn Y. Recommended practices and benchmark activity for hydrogen and oxygen electrocatalysis in water splitting and fuel cells.Adv. Mater. 2019; 31: 1806296Crossref PubMed Scopus (541) Google Scholar Particularly, the switch of the O–O bond-formation mechanism at different potentials on the tested Co-based electrocatalysts might have some inherent connections with the OEC bearing a Mn-based complex in nature. Unlike early transition metals (Ti, V, and Cr) that can form very stable M=O units or late transition metals (Ni and Cu) that can only theoretically form unstable M=O structures, the metal-oxo motif from Mn, Fe, and Co can switch between two valence tautomers in the form of Mn+1=O2– and Mn–O•–.2Zhang X.-P. Chandra A. Lee Y.-M. Cao R. Ray K. Nam W. Transition metal-mediated O-O bond formation and activation in chemistry and biology.Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021; 50: 4804-4811Crossref PubMed Google Scholar The former with an electrophilic oxygen atom can proceed via the water nucleophilic-attack AB pathway to form the O–O bond, whereas the latter favors the oxygen RC pathway for O–O bond formation. The two different pathways are believed to be concurrent in the Mn-based complex during water oxidation in nature. It is necessary to point out that the radical coupling process on metal-oxide-based electrocatalysts in water oxidation is usually very complicated because the lattice oxygen atoms can easily participate in the coupling. In the HO–Co(III)–(μ-O)2–Co(IV)–OH intermediate proposed by the authors, the HO–Co(III)– unit should be too stable to proceed in the RC process with the –Co(IV)–OH unit with only a partial radical character. The radical coupling might be more likely to involve the bridged oxygen atoms, as generally proposed in the OEC in nature.7Najafpour M.M. Renger G. Hołyńska M. Moghaddam A.N. Aro E.-M. Carpentier R. Nishihara H. Eaton-Rye J.J. Shen J.-R. Allakhverdiev S.I. Manganese compounds as water-oxidizing catalysts: from the natural water-oxidizing complex to nanosized manganese oxide structures.Chem. Rev. 2016; 116: 2886-2936Crossref PubMed Scopus (461) Google Scholar Overall, the observed mechanism switch from Wang and co-workers is thought provoking not only for the Co-based heterogeneous electrocatalytic OER but also for the biological water-oxidation process. Observation of a potential-dependent switch of water-oxidation mechanism on Co-oxide-based catalystsLang et al.ChemApril 14, 2021In BriefThe O–O bond formation is a key elementary step of the water-oxidation reaction, of which the dependence on the applied potential remains ambiguous. Using water-in-salt electrolyte, we systematically tuned the water activity and probed the mechanism as a function of applied potentials. We found that the mechanism is sensitive to the applied potential. The O–O bond forms via an intramolecular oxygen coupling mechanism at low potentials, whereas it proceeds through a water nucleophilic attack mechanism at high potentials. Full-Text PDF Open Archive